In order to understand how streams function, geologists have to be able to measure the characteristics of streams
This field trip will allow students to measure a local
stream. This trip is accompanied by an exercise in interpreting stream
data from the USGS.
On my field trip I was instructed by Dr. Tim Diehl of the USGS and helped by Judy Butler and Alex Rouse.
In looking for a stream, we wanted one which would be:
Directions:
Because middle Tennessee has a humid sub-tropical climate which is wet in the winter and dry in the summer, the river tends to rise and fall with the seasons. The USGS's chart of stream flow for the year 2001 shows this. Therefore, in general, the best time for gaging the Harpeth is summer or early fall.
Before you go, check the real
time USGS data and go only if the depth of the river is not much more
than 1 foot.
|
USGS safety rules require anyone working in a stream, beside a stream or above a stream to wear a life jacket. |
Stream gaging involves three steps:
Equipment for gaging a stream:
Finding
an ideal site: When we arrived, Tim set off to find an ideal
site. An ideal site minimizes water turbulence which can make measuring
velocity difficult.
Before
you start taking measurements, put one of your spikes in at the water's
edge. You need to do this because the level of the Harpeth River
can change suddenly due to release of water from the sewage treatment plant.
If that happened while you were measuring, it would invalidate your measures.
Task
1: Measuring the width of the stream.
Take the high numbered end of the rope and tie it to
a tree on the far side of the stream. One person should check that
the stream is flowing at right angles to the rope while another person
fastens the other end into the beach with one of the spikes.
Write down the measurement of the two edges of the stream. On the day we measured it, the near side of the stream was at 21' and the far side at 87', making it 66' wide.
Note that a small increase in the depth of the stream
would make it very much wider.
Task 2: Measuring the depth of the stream.
Now take the yardstick and, at each 5' marker measure
the depth of the stream. Call out the readings to your recorder on the
shore. Now you have a profile of the stream.
We took our readings in inches, but because all our other
readings are in feet, we will convert the readings to feet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| inches |
4
|
9
|
12
|
14
|
13
|
11
|
10
|
10
|
11
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
9
|
| feet |
.33
|
.75
|
1.00
|
1.17
|
1.08
|
.92
|
.83
|
.83
|
.92
|
.83
|
.83
|
.83
|
.75
|
Task 3: Measuring the velocity of the
stream.
Take
the measuring tape to one side of the stream and measure down 20'.
Mark this point on the shore with flagging tape or a spike. 20' is
a good distance on the Harpeth. The river runs slowly enough that
it's easy to get an accurate measure.
Do the same on the other side. You can have your
timer line these two points up from the shore or you can connect
them with a string. Using a string makes measuring easier, and you
can check the accuracy of your 20' a several points across the stream.
Set
up a three person team. The first stands at the original line.
Standing to one side, so that he/she will not interfere with the water
flow, he/she releases the orange, shouting "mark' to let the timer start
the stopwatch.
The second person stands at the finish line and shouts 'mark' when the orange crosses the finish line.
The third person holds the stopwatch and records the time.
Take three readings at each of the 5' marks.
|
In our first attempt at the 25' marker (in 4 inches of water), our orange got stuck on the bottom. Tim suggested that we take our reading using orange peel. This option worked for us because there wasn't much wind which might have blown the peel around, affecting the velocity reading. |
Now you have all the data you need.
Before you leave, check your spike at the edge of the
river to make sure the level hasn't changed. and be sure to leave the site
as clean as you found it (if not cleaner).
Calculating Discharge
Looking at our findings. At each 5 foot mark, we
took 3 readings (# of seconds to go 20 feet):
| # Feet |
25'
|
30'
|
35'
|
40'
|
45'
|
50'
|
55'
|
60'
|
65'
|
70'
|
75'
|
80'
|
85'
|
| 1st |
62.62
|
25.32
|
25.51
|
24.94
|
20.62
|
19.23
|
19.79
|
20.22
|
24.00
|
37.77
|
47.46
|
56.59
|
53.27
|
| 2nd |
58.72
|
32.16
|
28.95
|
20.10
|
26.11
|
17.03
|
14.27
|
21.74
|
33.54
|
38.39
|
45.55
|
68.47
|
59.72
|
| 3rd |
54.78
|
38.01
|
25.19
|
22.49
|
24.63
|
19.46
|
16.55
|
24.19
|
28.70
|
36.88
|
46.41
|
55.09
|
68.37
|
We have a problem. We have three readings. How do we arrive at a single time. There are two ways of doing it:
Once we have picked our time, we need to calculate the velocity. Velocity is feet per second. Our orange floated 20 feet, so our velocity is 20/# seconds. Let's do it for the readings at 25 feet.
# of seconds = 58.72 (middle reading)
Velocity = 20/58.72 = 0.3 feet/second
|
# Feet
|
25'
|
30'
|
35'
|
40'
|
45'
|
50'
|
55'
|
60'
|
65'
|
70'
|
75'
|
80'
|
85'
|
| Median |
58.72
|
32.16
|
25.51
|
22.49
|
24.63
|
19.46
|
16.55
|
21.74
|
28.70
|
37.77
|
46.41
|
56.59
|
59.72
|
| Velocity |
0.3
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
1.0
|
1.2
|
0.9
|
0.7
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
Notice that the water moves faster in the center of the stream than on its edges. Why do you think that this is so?
While taking readings, Alex noticed that the bubbles on the surface of the water traveled faster than the orange, which was floating deeper in the water. Why do you think that this is so? Would the velocity be even slower, if we measured deeper in the stream?
We now have all of the measurements we need, but we still have a problem. The depth of the stream varies as we cross it, and so the the velocity.
We calculate the discharge by dividing the stream up into sections centered around our measurement points. The sections are five feet wide. For each sections we assume that
| # Feet |
25'
|
30'
|
35'
|
40'
|
45'
|
50'
|
55'
|
60'
|
65'
|
70'
|
75'
|
80'
|
85'
|
| Width |
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
4.5
|
| Discharge |
.57
|
2.33
|
3.92
|
5.19
|
4.40
|
4.77
|
5.04
|
3.8
|
3.2
|
2.2
|
1.8
|
1.5
|
1.1
|
Our total discharge is the sum of all of our totals = 39.8 feet^3/second
How
does this compare to the official discharge. The USGS stream gaging
station continually measures the Harpeth River that this bridge.
|
The official readings are made this way. Every now and then, geologists measure discharge much as we just did. They measure discharge on different days, when the stage of the water differs. They then plot their findings on a graph called a rating curve. This curve shows the stage of the river as a function of discharge. For an example of a rating curve follow this link. Once this graph is established for this point, all the USGS needs to do is to measure the stage (which can be done with the automated machinery on the bridge) and then calculate the discharge from the curve. |
On June 22, from 9-10 am, the USGS measured the river level at 1.1 feet and the discharge at 24.0 cubic feet/second. USGS Data
Why did our reading come out so much higher?
Tim says that there are two reasons.
A Harpeth River Paradox
If people know anything about geology, they know the
following two laws:
The Harpeth River's sources are in the Stones River Group in South East Williamson County. The Stones River Group is the oldest stratum exposed in middle Tennessee. It then runs northwest, through the Nashville Group in northern Williamson County and across the southwest corner of Davidson County, through the Silurian and Devonian strata of southern Cheatham County, and finally through the Fort Payne Formation in which it flows into the Cumberland River. The river flows from the oldest stratum exposed in middle
Tennessee to the youngest.
Can you resolve this paradox? Try to answer it yourself before you look at the solution. |
Home | Exercises | Fossils | Field Trips | Natural Resources | Ordovician Period | Rocks | Strata